COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MODERN DAGESTAN STUDENT YOUTH VALUE ORIENTATIONS

It has been carried out a comparative socially-philosophical analysis of value orientations of the modern Dagestan youth, its relation to national and international problems in the region. Sociological material quiz and analysis of Dagestan students opinion is indicated there: DSU, DSPU, DSMA, DSTU and DSAA. Distribution of answers according to universities gives differentiating picture of students value orientations. Thus, for instance, during sociocultural and ethnonational values research of various socially-ethnical cultures modern studentship, the answers to the question “What do you follow in your behavior?” shown that traditions and customs of elders, ancestors act as the basic behavior regulator for 52,1 % of Dagestan students. Also the opinions of “relatives and friends”, surrounding people significantly influence on Dagestan students. Many students act in a certain manner by force of “habit” (17%), and “calculation” (12%) stands behind their actions. A lot of people follow “exiting national traditions” in their behavior (64, 6%). Behavior formation on “calculation” is accepted to consider as pragmatic tendencies manifestation in a person moral orientations, which in their turn, act as the result of socially-political instability of modern society, changes in the sphere of labor and personal relations, reflect disbelief to the authority and surrounding people. Birthplace and nationality of a person, settled factor can also significantly influence on his value system formation. According to the results of the research, natives of the Dagestan village are in their behavior more inclined to follow “surrounding people opinion” (35%), “existing national traditions” (35%). Urban students – “opinion of relatives and friends” (27%), “habit” (13%), “law” (10%), “intelligence” (60%). Determination of a person moral quality in the ethnonational environment is considered to be the important moment under the value orientations analysis of the Dagestan student youth. 
It turned out that the students of the Dagestan universities more over appreciate in people such qualities as honesty (68,7%), kindness (40,6%), industry (28,7%), modesty (28,1%) and self-esteem (25,7%).  But patriotism and internationalism are more highly appreciated by the Dagestan students (60,9%), than other personal qualities. The idea about Dagestan students estimation peculiarities of some or other features, person qualities, beginning from patriotism, gives us their further analysis depending on gender, speciality, university, nationality, place of birth and a year of study. If speak about patriotism and internationalism separately in the respondents estimations according to the indicated parameters, then men (youth) (63%) highly estimate the given quality, than women (girls) (38%). The students of technical specialities (45%) estimate patriotic orientations and qualities of a person higher, than humanitarian (25%) and naturalist students (20%).  Among DSPU there are about (32%) of such students, while in DSMA there are (22%), but in DSAA the given quality remained without estimation. 28% of Russian students consider patriotism and internationalism to be valuable qualities of a person. Patriotism is rather more valuable for the village natives (45%). Industry, working efficiency, patriotism and internationalism are rather more valuable qualities for men (33%), technical specialties students (35%), DSTU students (43%), equally for the students of Kumyk, Lezgin and Lak nationalities (35%), those who live in urban area (40%). Self-esteem is more estimated by women (girls) (29%), technical specialties students (31%), DSTU students (46%), respondents of Lak nationality (39%) and urban natives (34%).

1. Агеева Н.А. Социокультурные образцы как эффективное средство духовного возрождения семьи и общества // Гуманитарные и социальные науки. 2012. № 3.

2. Ибрагимов Х.А. Социокультурные ценности современного дагестанского студенчества (сравнительный анализ). Махачкала, 2011.

3. Камалова О.Н., Шаповал Г.Н. К вопросу о нравственном воспитании российских и иностранных студентов, обучающихся вместе // Гуманитарные и социальные науки. 2014. № 2.

4. Мустафаев Ф.М. Проблема толерантности в системе межэтнических и межкультурных отношений // Гуманитарные и социально-экономические науки. 2013. № 2.

5. Социальные трансформации в России: Теории, практики, сравнительный анализ. Учебное пособие. Под ред. В.А. Ядова 2005.

6. Философия: Учебное пособие. В.К. Лукашевич, В.М. Белокурский, И.П. Мамыкин и др. / под ред. В.К.Лукашевича. Мн., 2013.

7. Финько М.В. Проблема межличностного общения и духовный кризис: культурологический анализ // Известия высших учебных заведений. Северо-Кавказский регион. Серия: Общественные науки. 2005. № 3.

8. Kolosova O.Y., Goncharov V.N. Spiritual life of society: regional aspect // Научный альманах стран Причерноморья. 2015. № 4. http://science-almanac.ru

9. Mustafayev F.M., Mustafayeva Z.S. The influence of customs and traditions on the formation and spiritual development of society in a multicultural region // Научный альманах стран Причерноморья. 2016. № 2. http://science-almanac.ru/Petrova Yulia Andreevna – candidate of philosophy, professor assistant. Rostov state university of economics, Rostov-on-Don, Russia

10. Different words can create various contextual considerations because language forms our thoughts, the nature of our communicational choices, and the relations, identity, and evaluative outcomes of this choice. From the twentieth century language came to be regarded as an "intermediate world" between thought and reality, individual consciousness and culture, a world in which an unstructured stream of impressions and unrelated messages got a conceptual form. The culture of the North Caucasus is not only a spatio-temporal boundaries of existence of separate ethnic groups living in this territory, but also reflects the vital functions of the individual, group and society as a whole. The ethnolinguistic view of the North Caucasus is a complex, dynamic, secondary formation, which has invariant ethno-linguistic constants, providing communication not only within the framework of the ethno-linguistic culture but also between cultures, due to the fact that language and culture are interconnected with each other.

11. Key words: North Caucasus, language, consciousness, culture, semiotization, ethnolinguistic identity, linguaculture.

12. Ilyasova R.S. Culturological aspect of the linguistic personality study// Научный альманах стран Причерноморья. 2016. № 2. http://science-almanac.ru/

13. Petrova Yu.A., Yarovoy M.V. The North Caucasian peculiarities of verbal and nonverbal communication in comparative analysis with other ethnic groups // Научный альманах стран Причерноморья. 2016. № 2. http://science-almanac.ru/

14. Mustafaev M., Mustafaeva M., Magomedova Z. Formation and development of patriotism as the most important stability factor of modern Dagestan society // Научный альманах стран Причерноморья. 2016. № 3. http://science-almanac.ru/