Historical Consciousness in the Process of Forming Ethnic Stereotypes of Material Culture

The concept of stereotype, or ethnic stereotype, in ethnic science is associated with the formula «ethnic stereotype of behavior». Numerous works by ethnographers, culturologists and other scientists confirm the special relevance of the study of this phenomenon. There is an urgent need for a holistic consideration of ethnic stereotypes of behavior, not just in the usual way to ethnographers (as expressed in a particular form of elements of traditional everyday culture), but also in terms of their functioning in the sphere of everyday consciousness. However, stereotyping in ethnic tradition is a concept that covers a wider range of issues that differ from exclusively behavioral forms. Stereotyping is a phenomenon that is characteristic of many manifestations of the functioning of elements of traditional everyday culture. Tradition is understood as experience accumulating in the form of a system of stereotypes of human activity (activity), stereotypes of ideas about them and ways of their designation or symbolization. From this point of view, behavioral acts can be considered as particular manifestations of symbolic stereotypes. Relevant here are the aspects of human activity related to the production of material components of culture, ideas about them, or their perception as ethnic carriers. The main thesis communicativeness is one of the most important functions of tradition, involves a number of questions: which of the components of the material culture of peoples most persistently retain their specificity, being ethnic indicators of historical consciousness; how they function in time, what are the factors that stabilize, consolidate and transmit precisely these, and not other components of culture, what is the intensity of their historical existence (discreteness, continuity). In that case the problem of territorial and spatial relations appears, that is, the correlation of sub-ethnic, ethnic and superethnic in the cultural tradition, in this case, in its material components and their functioning.

1. Baklanova O.A. Baklanov I.S. Sovremennaya rossiyskaya sotsialnost v kontekste sotsialnogo konstruktsionizma. Voprosy sotsial'noy teorii. [Modern Russian sociality in the context of social constructionism. Questions of social theory.]. 2015. V. 7. No. 1-2. pp. 168-177. (In Russian).

2. Goverdovskaya E.V. Osobennosti proyektirovaniya obrazovatelnogo prostranstva vysshey shkoly v polikulturnom regione. Ekonomicheskiye i gumanitarnyye is-sledovaniya regionov. [Features of designing the educational space of higher education in a multicultural region. Economic and humanitarian studies of the regions]. 2014. No. 4. pp. 7-10. (In Russian).

3. Goncharov V.N. Sotsialnyy aspekt religii v kontekste razvitiya pervobytnogo obshchestva. Gumanitarnyye i sotsialno-ekonomicheskiye nauki. [The social aspect of religion in the context of the development of primitive society. Humanitarian and socioeconomic sciences. 2016. No. 2 (87). pp. 45-49. (In Russian).

4. Erokhin A.M. Religiya i iskusstvo v sisteme kultury. [Religion and art in the cultural system]. European Social Science Journal. 2014. No. 7-2 (46). pp. 9-12. (In Russian).

5. Kartashev A.V., Sklyarova E.K., Kamalova O.N. Olimpiady po istorii meditsiny: opyt organizatsii i osobennosti provedeniya. Gumanitarnyye i sotsialno-ekonomicheskiye nauki. [Olympiads on the history of medicine: the experience of organization and the features of the conduct. Humanitarian and socio-economic sciences]. 2017. No. 1 (92). pp. 151-156. (In Russian).

6. Kolosova O.Yu. Dukhovnaya sfera: universalizm i samobytnost. [The spiritual sphere: universalism and identity]. European Social Science Journal. 2012. No. 11-2 (27). pp. 6-12. (In Russian).

7. Lobeiko Yu.A. Sotsialno-pedagogicheskiy aspekt aktivnosti lichnosti v sisteme obshchestvennogo razvitiya. Ekonomicheskiye i gumanitarnyye issledovaniya regionov. [Socio-pedagogical aspect of personality activity in the system of social development. Economic and humanitarian studies of regions]. 2015. No. 1. pp. 15-18. (In Russian).

8. Lukyanov G.I. Transformatsionnyye protsessy v sovremennom rossiyskom obshchestve kak otrazheniye dinamiki novoy sotsialnoy realnosti. Ekonomicheskiye i gumanitarnyye issledovaniya regionov. [Transformational processes in modern Russian society as a reflection of the dynamics of a new social reality. Economic and humanitarian studies of regions]. 2017. No. 4. pp. 64-68. (In Russian).

9. Matyash T.P., Nesmeyanov E.E. Pravoslavnyy tip kultury: ideya i realnost. Gumanitarnyye i sotsialno-ekonomicheskiye nauki. [Orthodox type of culture: idea and reality. Humanitarian and socio-economic sciences]. 2015. No. 3 (82). pp. 39-44. (In Russian).

10. Shenkao M.A. Narody Kavkaza i Prichernomorya: iskusstvo krasnorechiya. Nauchnyy almanakh stran Prichernomorya. [People of Caucasus and Black Sea Region: oratory skill. Science Almanac of Black Sea Region Countries]. 2017. No. 2. pp. 15-24. (In Russian).

11. Vigel N., Zholbova I. Heroic epos of North Caucasus Nations as basic for ethnical culture of Adygea people. Science Almanac of Black Sea Region Countries. 2017. No. 2 (10). pp. 25-30.