Background knowledge as a sociocultural factor in the development of science
https://doi.org/10.23947/2414-1143-2022-30-2-3-9
Abstract
The urgent demands of the present, as well as the epistemological interests in which mankind's intentions regarding the prediction of future forms of studying reality, as well as its transformation, are the most important factors that determine the movement of knowledge as a whole. The development of knowledge in the world occurs through a huge number of existing sciences. In fact, all of them represent a variety of directions of this information expansion. Throughout history, the justification and analysis of the most common foundations of human knowledge, as well as the identification of their prerequisites, have always referred to the most pressing tasks of knowledge, the importance of which is not only scientifically and theoretically, but also socially and practically beyond doubt. From this perspective, consideration of the specifics of background knowledge, which acts as a vector of the epistemological process and the fundamental mechanism for the development of culture, is super actual and valuable. Having a worldview orientation, background knowledge not only contributes to the formation of a historically adequate picture of the world, but also reveals a powerful prognostic potential.
About the Author
A. V. PerekrestovaRussian Federation
Anastasiya V. Perekrestova, Ph.D. student
References
1. Aristotle. Vtoraia analitika [Second analytics]. Aristotle. Writings in 4 volumes. Moscow. Mysl. 1978. V. 2. 687 p. (in Russian).
2. Gadamer H.G. Aktualnost prekrasnogo [Relevance of the beautiful]. Moscow. Iskusstvo. 1991. 368 p. (in Russian).
3. Heisenberg W. Shagi za gorizont [Steps beyond the horizon]. Moscow. Progress. 1987. 368 p. (in Russian).
4. Lakatos I. Falsifikatsiia i metodologiia nauchno-issledovatelskikh program [Falsification and methodology of research programs]. Moscow. Medium. 1995. 236 p. (in Russian).
5. Mikeshina L.A. Filosofiia nauki: Sovremennaia epistemologiia. Nauchnoe znanie v dinamike kultury. Metodologiia nauchnogo issledovaniia [Philosophy of Science: Modern Epistemology. Scientific knowledge in cultural dynamics. Scientific research methodology]. Moscow. Progress-Traditsiia. MPSI. Flinta. 2005. 464 p. (in Russian).
6. Noveishii filosofskii slovar [Newest Philosophical Dictionary]. A.A. Gritsanov. Minsk. Publishing house: V.M. Skakun. 1999. 896 p. (in Russian).
7. Popper K. Logika i rost nauchnogo znaniia [Logic and the growth of scientific knowledge]. Moscow. 1983. 605 p. (in Russian).
8. Russell B. Chelovecheskoe poznanie, ego sfera i granitsy [Human cognition, its sphere and boundaries]. Moscow. Terra-Knizhnyi klub. Publishing house: Respublika. 2000. 464 p. (in Russian).
9. Stepin V.S. Samorazvivaiushchiesia sistemy i postneklassicheskaia ratsionalnost [Self-developing systems and post-classical rationality]. Questions of philosophy. Moscow. 2003. No. 8. pp. 5-17 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Perekrestova A.V. Background knowledge as a sociocultural factor in the development of science. Science Almanac of Black Sea Region Countries. 2022;30(2):3-9. https://doi.org/10.23947/2414-1143-2022-30-2-3-9