ETHNIC MIGRANTS ADAPTATION PROBLEM TO THE RECIPIENT CULTURE
Abstract
It is considered relevant aspects of adaptation problem of migrants to the recipient culture. Cultural adaptation is the adaptation of social groups and individuals to the changing natural and geographic conditions of life by means of stereotype changing of consciousness and behavior, forms of social organization and regulation, norms and values, lifestyle, ways of life provision, directions and technologies of activity. Modern researchers distinguish active and passive forms of adaptation, short-termed and long-termed, analyze inner (psychological) and extra sides of adaptation, successful and unsuccessful (low). It has been analyzed stages of migrants adaptation (G. Triandis); levels of psychological adaptation (F.B. Berezin); presented the model of foreign culture penetration, kinds of cultural differences of D.M. Bennet; considered types of adaptation at the individual level by L.V. Yanovsky; factors, determining the success of cross-cultural adaptation (M.Y. Orlova). It is defined the peculiarities of modern ethnic migration, its specificity in information epoch.
About the Authors
M. A. Shumenko
Southern federal university
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. V. Kamalov
Rostov state university of economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Biryukova M.A. Globalization: Integration and differentiation cultures // Philosophical science. 2001. No 1.
2. Goncharov V.N. Political information as a socio-psychological phenomenon of communication in the system of social development // The Humanities and socio-economic sciences. 2012. No 2.
3. Grushevitskaya T.G., Popkov V.D., Sadokhin A.P. Basics of intercultural communication. Moscow, 2002.
4. Kamalova O.N., Karpun A.B. The main structural elements of political power // The Humanities and social sciences. 2010. No 1.
5. Levin Z.I. The mentality of the Diaspora (system and socio-cultural analysis). M., 2001.
6. Maslova T.F. The socio-cultural integration of internally displaced persons in the local community at the turn of XX-XXI centuries. (An example of Stavropol Territory): Stavropol, 2009.
7. Makhanko N.V. The socio-cultural adaptation processes in the transformation of culture. Rostov-n-Don, 2001.
8. Mikhailova L.M. Metaphor in a tourist discourse and its means of translation // Humanities and social sciences. 2015. № 3. http://www.hses-online.ru/2015_03.html
9. Nesmeyanov E.E., Kolosova O.J. Information Culture in the context of global processes // The Humanities and socio-economic sciences. 2014. No 3.
10. Nesmeyanov E.E., Matyash T.P. Modern and contemporary modernization // The Humanities and socio-economic sciences. 2010. No 1.
11. Nesmeyanov E.E., Matyash T.P. "Civilization young": the idea and reality // The Humanities and social sciences. 2013. No 6.
12. Orlov M.Y. The integration of migrants into the local community through the eyes of young people // Migration in the South of Russia: experience of the sociological analysis. Rostov n/D, 2004.
13. Oschepkova N.A.Linguargumentative aspects of communication effectiveness// Humanities and social sciences. 2015. № 3. http://www.hses-online.ru/2015_03.html
14. Stefanenko T.G. Ethnopsychology. Moscow, 2004.
15. Triandis G.K. Culture and social behavior. Moscow, 2007.
16. Finko M.V. The problem of interpersonal and spiritual crisis: cultural analysis // Proceedings of the higher educational institutions. North Caucasus region. Series: Social Sciences. 2005. No 3. Flier A.Y. Adaptation of cultural // Cultural: XX century. Encyclopedia in 2 volumes. Vol. 1. SPb., 1999.
17. Huntington S. Who are we? Challenges to America's National Identity. M., 2004; Huntington S. The Clash of Civilizations. Moscow, 2003.
18. Shapoval G.N., Kamalov O.N. Features flow adaptation processes in the organization of educational work with foreign students // The Humanities and socio-economic sciences. 2011. No 3.
19. Bennet J.M. Cultural studies in cultural self-awareness. Min-neapolis, 1984.
20. Communities across borders. New immigrants and transnational cultures / Ed. by P. Kennedy and V. Roudometof. L., N.-Y., 2002.
21. Kamalova O.N., Andramonova V.V. Network society: problems of development and new forms of identity // Actual problems of science: from theory to practice. Proceedings of the III All-Russian scientific-practical conference. Moscow, 2016.
22. Kolosova O.Y., Goncharov V. N. Economic and ecological safety of the region: strategy choice // Science almanac of Black Sea region countries. 2015. No 3. http://science-almanac.ru
23. Petrenko S.P. Application of ethnic and national terminology in research of South Russian people// Science almanac of Black Sea region countries 2015. N 2. http://science-almanac.ru
24. Ten Y.P., Gudakov V.V. Symbols of the regional culture of the North Caucasus // Science almanac of Black Sea region countries". 2015. N 2. http://science-almanac.ru
Review
For citations:
Shumenko M.A., Kamalov A.V. ETHNIC MIGRANTS ADAPTATION PROBLEM TO THE RECIPIENT CULTURE. Science Almanac of Black Sea Region Countries. 2016;(1):34-40.
Views:
55
Email this article 