Socio-Philosophical Analysis of Labour Traditions: Ethnocultural Aspect of the Study
https://doi.org/10.23947/2414-1143-2020-23-3-3-10
Abstract
In the development of modern society, organizational and ideological educational activities are important. Successful realization of economic and social development is impossible without taking into account human factor, in particular skills and knowledge of people, their production experience. Therefore, cultural, economic and everyday traditions are now gaining real significance, especially in different regional conditions. The increasing interest in folk culture is determined not only by the needs of the spiritual sphere, but also by the practical conditionality and vitality of folk labor traditions. This creates the need to study cultural and historical experience of the people and their practical application. The range of problems related to labor traditions is very wide. Some of them are important for the whole country, while others have regional specifics. Domestic researchers consider labor traditions as a constantly operating element of folk culture, concentrating collective experience transmitted from generation to generation. Under the influence of socio-economic and economic changes, some of them become anachronism and die off, while others, transforming, retain their significance. Some of them are secondary forms generated by new production and living conditions, by both previous and new labor experience.
About the Authors
V. N. GoncharovRussian Federation
Vadim N. Goncharov – Ph.D. (Advanced Doctorate) in Philosophy, Associate Professor
Stavropol
L. A. Tronina
Russian Federation
Larisa A. Tronina – Ph.D. (Advanced Doctorate) in Philosophy, Associate Professor
Stavropol
E. A. Khokhlova
Russian Federation
Elena A. Khokhlova – Ph.D. in Philosophy, Associate Professor
Stavropol
References
1. Baklanova O.A., Baklanov I.S. Sovremennaia rossiiskaia sotsialnost v kontekste sotsial'nogo konstruktsionizma. Voprosy sotsialnoi teorii. [Modern Russian sociality in the context of social constructionism. Questions of social theory]. 2015. V. 7. No. 1-2. pp. 168-177 (in Russian).
2. Baklanova O.A., Baklanov I.S. Kontury tipologicheskogo issledovaniia sotsialnosti sovremennogo obshchestva. Izvestiia Saratovskogo universiteta. Seriia: Filosofiia. Psikhologiia. Pedagogika. [Contours of typological research of sociality of modern society. Izvestia, Saratov University. Series: Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogics]. 2014. V. 14. No. 2-1. pp. 5-10 (in Russian).
3. Goverdovskaya E.V. Sotsiokulturnye i etnologicheskie osobennosti regiona – osnova modernizatsii vysshego obrazovaniia na Severnom Kavkaze. Uchenye zapiski universiteta im. P.F. Lesgafta. [Sociocultural and ethnological features of the region are the basis for the modernization of higher education in the North Caucasus. Scientific notes of Lesgaft National State University]. 2007. No 7. pp. 28-34 (in Russian).
4. Goverdovskaya E.V. Osobennosti proektirovaniia obrazovatelnogo prostranstva vysshei shkoly v polikulturnom regione. Ekonomicheskie i gumanitarnye issledovaniia regionov. [Features of the design of the educational space of higher education in the multicultural region. Economic and humanitarian researches of regions]. 2014. No. 4. pp. 7-10 (in Russian).
5. Erokhin A.M. Sotsialno-filosofskie aspekty razvitiia kulturnoi sfery obshchestva. Ekonomicheskie i gumanitarnye issledovaniia regionov. [Socio-philosophical aspects of the development of the cultural sphere of society. Economic and humanitarian researches of regions]. 2016. No. 1. pp. 74-78 (in Russian).
6. Erokhin A.M. Nauchno-informatsionnyi aspekt issledovaniia sotsiokulturnogo razvitiia obshchestva v oblasti kultury i iskusstva. Ekonomicheskie i gumanitarnye issledovaniia regionov. [Scientific and informational aspect of research of sociocultural development of society in the field of culture and art. Economic and humanitarian researches of regions]. 2015. No. 2. pp. 123-128 (in Russian).
7. Ivushkina E.B., Dashkova E.V. Kommunikatsionnyi podkhod v muzeevedenii. [Communication approach in museum studies]. Novocherkassk, 2005 (in Russian).
8. Kolosova O.Yu. Dukhovnaia sfera: universalizm i samobytnost. [Spiritual sphere: universalism and identity]. European Social Science Journal. 2012. No. 11-2(27). pp. 6-12 (in Russian).
9. Lobeyko Yu.A. Sotsialno-pedagogicheskii aspekt aktivnosti lichnosti v sisteme obshchestvennogo razvitiia. Ekonomicheskie i gumanitarnye issledovaniia regionov. [Socio-pedagogical aspect of individual activity in the system of social development. Economic and humanitarian researches of regions]. 2015. No. 1. pp. 15-18 (in Russian).
10. Lobeyko Yu.A. Sotsialnaia aktivnost lichnosti v obshchestve: sotsialnopedagogicheskie aspekty formirovaniia. [Social activity of the individual in society: socio-pedagogical aspects of formation]. European Social Science Journal. 2014. No. 7-2(46). pp. 282-284 (in Russian).
11. Matyash T.P., Matyash D.V., Nesmeyanov E.E. "Nauki o prirode" i "nauki o dukhe": sudba staroi dilemmy. Gumanitarnye i sotsialno-ekonomicheskie nauki. ["Science of Nature" and "Science of Spirit": the fate of the old dilemma. Humanitarian and socioeconomic sciences]. 2015. No. 1 (80). pp. 10-16 (in Russian).
12. Mustafayev M.B., Mustafaeva Z.S., Mustafayev F.M. Natsionalnoe i natsionalnospetsificheskoe v sisteme mezhnatsionalnogo obshcheniia. Gumanitarnye i sotsialnoekonomicheskie nauki. [National and national-specific in the system of interethnic communication]. Humanitarian and socio-economic sciences. 2016. No. 1 (86). pp. 83-89 (in Russian).
13. Nesmeyanov E.E., Kolosova O.Yu. Informatsionnaia kultura v kontekste globalnykh protsessov. Gumanitarnye i sotsialno-ekonomicheskie nauki. [Information culture in the context of global processes. Humanitarian and socio-economic sciences]. 2014. No. 3. pp. 5-7 (in Russian).
14. Akaev V. Ethnocultural diversity and consolidation of Сaucasus people unity: theoretic-methodologic analysis. Science almanac of Black Sea region countries. 2016.No. 3 (7). pp. 21-25.
15. Berkovskiy V., Tronina L. Social and historical aspect of interaction of ethnic culture and personality in the context of public development. Science almanac of Black Sea region countries. 2019. No. 1(17). pp. 3-9.
16. Kuleshin M., Leonova N., Nemashkalov P. Historical consciousness as a part of national consciousness: to the problem statement of the research. Science almanac of Black Sea region countries. 2019. No. 1(17). pp. 41-47.
Review
For citations:
Goncharov V.N., Tronina L.A., Khokhlova E.A. Socio-Philosophical Analysis of Labour Traditions: Ethnocultural Aspect of the Study. Science Almanac of Black Sea Region Countries. 2020;22(3):7-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23947/2414-1143-2020-23-3-3-10