COMPARATIVE-HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF EASTERN BLACK SEA REGION PEOPLE’S INTERACTION
https://doi.org/10.23947/2414-1143-2017-11-3-6-11
Abstract
The Eastern Black sea region has been developing independently for more than four centuries, within this period the culture of this territory has changed, that has led to a change in intercultural interaction. In today's globally competitive and more peaceful condition of existence, there is a need for constructive dialogue between neighbors, which leads to the need for a better understanding of each of the parties. Comparative culturology can help to determine the differences and common points of contact of the peoples of the eastern Black Sea region, which will open the door for deep, lasting and long-term relations between the cultures and people of Georgia, Abkhazia and the Krasnodar territory of Russia. The aim of the study is to reveal the cultural background on the basis of which these people can interact and determine if there are positive prospects for joint interaction in various spheres of culture. To achieve these goals, several research steps have been carried out, in particular, they include: the definition of comparative study as a term and as a scientific basis for research; comparison of the declared cultures from a non-verbal point of view; providing data on the multilateral distribution of languages in neighboring areas; analysis of the traditional aspect of cultures of Georgia, Abkhazia and the Krasnodar territory of Russia. The final part of the study shows promising results on today's and future cultural interaction in the region of the eastern coast of the Black Sea.
About the Authors
Yulia A. PetrovaRussian Federation
Yulia A. Petrova – candidate of philosophy, associate professor. Rostov state university of economics. Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation.
Maxim V. Yarovoy
Russian Federation
Maxim V. Yarovoy – student. Rostov state university of economics. Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation.
References
1. Borzova E.P. Comparative culturology. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg, 2013.
2. Volkova L.B. Nonverbal behavior of Russians and Japanese in a comparative aspect // Universum: Philology and art criticism. 2016. No 6 (28). URL: http://7universum.com/en/philology/archive/item/3298 (reference date: 09/10/2017).
3. Vasilyeva O.A. Hospitality as part of the cultural tradition of the peoples of the Northern Caucasus // The peoples of the North Caucasus: History and Modernity. Materials of the All-Russian Research Conference. Khasavyurt. 2012.
4. Leontiev A. A. Psychology of communication. M., 1999.
5. Petrova Yu.A. Linguistic and cultural view on the relationship between subculture and language. Materials of international science-practical conference “Regional problems of modern migration”. Rostov-on-Don, March 28, 2016. http://science-almanac.ru/documents/72/2016-01-14-Petrova.pdf
6. Sklyarova E.K., Kamalova O.N. Philosophical aspects of Victorian health service // Economic and humanitarian researches of the regions. 2015. No 1.
7. Ekman P. Facial expression // Nonverbal behavior and communication. New York, 1978.
8. Hall Edward T. The hidden dimension. Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y., 1966.
9. Hofstede G. The business of international business is culture // International business review Vol. 3. No. 1. 1994.
10. McDermott R. Profile: Ray L. Birdwhistell. The Kinesics Report. 1980. No 2 (3).
11. Petrova Yu., Yarovoy M. Ecological and cultural identity of the peoples of the North Caucasus // Science almanac of Black Sea region countries . 2016. No 4.
12. Sampson E. The image factor. L., 1994.
Review
For citations:
Petrova Yu.A., Yarovoy M.V. COMPARATIVE-HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF EASTERN BLACK SEA REGION PEOPLE’S INTERACTION. Science Almanac of Black Sea Region Countries. 2017;11(3):6-11. https://doi.org/10.23947/2414-1143-2017-11-3-6-11