EXPLICATION OF HISTORICAL CONSCIOUSNESS IN CONTEXT OF RUSSIAN CULTURE NATIONAL SECURITY FORMATION
https://doi.org/10.23947/2414-1143-2017-12-4-1-6
Abstract
The cultural and philosophic explication of the notion “national security culture” is presented. It is argued that the essence of the “national security culture” definition is reflected in the cultural certainty of the goals and methods of national security generated by the influence of both exogenous and endogenous factors. In Russia, such certainty is impossible without the community of axiological unity around its cultural and historic core. It is impossible to achieve this unity without a consensus about the cognition and evaluation of its past, that is, without the formation of a common historical consciousness. Historical consciousness fragmentation under the globalization processes influence in modern Russia leads to the diffusion of cultural certainty and security purposes and means of determinancy. This, in its turn, determines the hazard of safety culture elimination. In consequence of the national security culture temporal certainty, foundation of its unite national historical consciousness is considered to be the main formation factor. Therefore, in order to ensure national security, it is necessary to build the self-awareness of Russian citizens on the basis of not individualistic and pragmatic, but historically formed collectivist and spiritual values. Mainly they define the Russia civilization archetype and appear to be the main determinant of its cultural identity preservation. Since the historical consciousness is a basic factor in ensuring the society axiological consensus, while collectivistic and ideocratic components are the dominant in the Russians’ mentality the following author conclusion appears to be legitimate. The cultural-historical certainty of the goals and methods of national security determines the necessity to provide the historical consciousness with the priority status of a national security object. Citizens associations under the dominant role of the state will act as the subjects of national security ensuring.
About the Author
Yury A. ShestakovRussian Federation
Yury A. Shestakov – candidate of history, associate professor. Institute of service and entrepreneurship (branch) of Don state technical university. Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation.
References
1. Gurevich P.S. Culture philosophy: textbook for higher school M.: Publishing house NOTABENE, 2001.
2. Zadokhin A.G. National security: culture and historical consciousness // Geopolitical journal. 2015. No 3(10).
3. Koshkin R.P. Culture and security in the modern world // Strategic Priorities. 2012. No 14.
4. Kuznetsov V.V. Sociology security. M.: Book and business, 2003.
5. Polishchuk V.I. World and national culture. Ekaterinburg, 1993.
6. Savitskaya E.A. Methodological approaches to the safety research as a systemic paradigm // Russia Agrogrocery policy. 2012. No 12.
7. Smirnova A.G. The security culture as a factor of threat cognition in international relations // Vestnik of socially-political studies. 2013. No 12.
8. Sosnin V.A. Problems of security and consolidation of Russian society // Applied legal psychology. 2015. No 2.
9. Stepin V.S. Personality in the technotronic era // Science in Russia. 1993. No 2.
10. Cheban V.V. Russia national security (socially-philosophical analysis). Balashov, 1997.
11. Nesmeyanov E.E., Rudenko A.M., Kotlyarova V.V. Sociocultural analysis of cyberterrorism in social nets within the problems of information safety of Russian society // Science almanac of Black Sea region countries 2015. N 4. URL: http://science-almanac.ru
Review
For citations:
Shestakov Yu.A. EXPLICATION OF HISTORICAL CONSCIOUSNESS IN CONTEXT OF RUSSIAN CULTURE NATIONAL SECURITY FORMATION. Science Almanac of Black Sea Region Countries. 2017;12(4):1-6. https://doi.org/10.23947/2414-1143-2017-12-4-1-6