Preview

Science Almanac of Black Sea Region Countries

Advanced search

TRADITITIONAL TURKISH AND COSSACK WEDDING CEREMONIES: GENERAL AND PECULIAR (SAFRANBOLU AND COSSACK VILLAGE NIZHNE-KUNDRYUCHENSKOJ EXAMPLES)

https://doi.org/10.23947/2414-1143-2018-13-2-47-54

Abstract

A comparative analysis of a traditional wedding ritualism in Turkish and Cossack cultures on the example of Safranbolu region and Cossack village Nizhne-Kundryuchenskoj. A wedding ritualism is regarded as inherent human need in ritualization important vital events, the preservation of the ancestral memory of wedding traditions in songs, tales etc. Turkish and Cossack principles of marriage proposal in these regions are analyzed. Cossack wedding traditions of the 19th century combined pagan beliefs and Christianity. Such a synthesis is typical for the traditional Turkish wedding, where along with the Islamic traditions there are remnants of the preIslamic period. For thousands of years, the traditions of many peoples of Anatolia, the Mediterranean region, the Middle East, the Caucasus, Eastern Europe, Central Asia and, of course, the ancient world have merged into an unexpected amalgamation, which today is commonly called the Turkish, or Asia Minor culture. This paper explores special features of rituals and traditions accompanying marriage ceremonies in Safranbolu and Nizhne-Kundryuchenskoj. Community rituals historically accompanied the most important events in a human life in Ancient Russia and Turkey. They were sacred being carefully passed through the generations. Many strange traditions were perfectly kept up to now. A contemporary challenge nowadays is to optimize cooperation of cultures and rituals between nations with different upbringing and development of the person based on local traditions. 

About the Authors

Kseniya A. Milenkaya
Rostov Region State Archive
Russian Federation

Kseniya A. Milenkaya – head of the Informational and Publication Department of the Rostov Region State Archive, Russian Federation.



Marina I. Zhbannikova
State Archive of the Rostov region; Moscow University named after S.Y. Vitte
Russian Federation

Marina I. Zhbannikova – Leading archeograph of the Rostov Region State Archive, Lecturer S.U. Vitte Moscow University affiliate in с. Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation.



References

1. Van Gennep Arnold. Obryady perekhoda. M.: Izdatelstvo Vostochnaya literatura RAN, 1999. (In Russian)

2. Enina I.A. Issledovatel donskoj stariny Hariton Ivanovich Popov // Donskoj vremennik. Rostov-na-Donu: DGPB, Sentyabr', 2004. (In Russian)

3. Kononov A.N. Grammatika sovremennogo turetskogo literaturnogo yazyka. Moskva-Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1956. (In Russian)

4. Pomolvka v Turtsii: traditsii i zakony. Retrieved from: http://alanyatoday.ru/articles/99-pomolvka-v-turcii-tradicii-i-zakony.html (In Russian)

5. Traditsii svad'by i obrucheniya v Turtsii. Retrieved from: https://mjusli.ru/psihologija/lyubovnye-otnosheniya/svadba-v-turcii. (In Russian)

6. AKMAN Eyüp. Safranbolu Folklorundan Örnekler, Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi, 2004. S. 51.

7. K.Ş. 6: Hamdi Acar, 75, Demir Zelik İşzisi, İlkokul Mezunu, Safranbolu.

8. Ö. Ergin, H. Akçın, S. Karakış, H. Şahin (2005). Geleneksel Safranbolu Mimarisinin Kayıt Altına Alınmasına Yönelik CBS Uygulaması: Safranbis, Ankara: TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası, 10. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı, 28 Mart – 1 Nisan, 2005.

9. Ş. Seher Erol Çalışkan, Şerife Oral. Safranbolu’da evlilik adetleri. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. The Journal of International Social Research. Cilt: 9 Sayı: 43 Volume: 9 Issue: 43. Nisan 2016, April 2016. Retrieved from: www.sosyalarastirmalar.com 10.

10. Safranbis, Ankara: TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası, 10. Türkiye Harita Bi-limsel ve Teknik Kurultayı, 28 Mart –1 Nisan. 2005.

11. Safranbolu.mezuniyet çalişmasi. hazirlayan: Elvan Aydin/yönetici doç.dr. Bülent Yorulmaz. Yakin Dogu Üniversitesi. Fen edebiyat fakültesi. türk dili ve edebiyati. Lefkoşa. 2000.

12. GARO. F. 55. Popov Hariton Ivanovich «chlen Donskogo oblastnogo statisticheskogo ko-miteta i komissii po ustrojstvu Donskogo muzeya». g. Novocherkassk. 1637-1919.

13. GARO. F. 55. Op. 1. D. 43. L. 1.

14. GARO. F. 55. Op. 1. D. 43. L. 1 ob. – 2.

15. GARO. F. 55. Op. 1. D. 43. L. 4 ob. – 5.

16. GARO. F. 55. Op. 1. D. 43. L. 5 ob.

17. GARO. F. 55. Op. 1. D. 43. L. 5.

18. GARO. F. 55. Op. 1. D. 43. L. 7.

19. GARO. F. 55. Op. 1. D. 43. L. 9.

20. GARO. F. 55. Op. 1. D. 43. L. 12 ob. – 13.


Review

For citations:


Milenkaya K.A., Zhbannikova M.I. TRADITITIONAL TURKISH AND COSSACK WEDDING CEREMONIES: GENERAL AND PECULIAR (SAFRANBOLU AND COSSACK VILLAGE NIZHNE-KUNDRYUCHENSKOJ EXAMPLES). Science Almanac of Black Sea Region Countries. 2018;15(3):47-54. https://doi.org/10.23947/2414-1143-2018-13-2-47-54

Views: 158


ISSN 2414-1143 (Online)
12+