THE INTERACTION OF LEVELS OF HISTORICAL CONSCIOUSNESS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE CULTURE OF NATIONAL SECURITY

The article analyzes the interaction of the levels of historical consciousness in the context of the formation of the culture of national security. The structure of historical consciousness as a special kind of social consciousness usually includes two main levels: scientific (theoretical, ideological) and ordinary (empirical, psychological and emotional). It is stated that the historical science and philosophy of history are conditioned by the General cultural determinants of mass historical consciousness, which make up the matrix of historical memory and "grow" primarily on the basis of the ordinary level of historical consciousness. The advantage of the mythologized ordinary level of historical consciousness is that it allows to transfer moral imperatives, which are guided by the national-state community, which is the essence of its cultural identity, from the sphere of the present limited by the various conditions of cash by "rooting" in history to the aspect of due. On the other hand, bearing in mind the inter-interests of national security, it is necessary to strengthen the role of historical science and philosophy of history in the fight against non cultural manifestations of historical consciousness, which are based, or rather parasitize, on such a fundamental characteristic of the empirical, ordinary, socio-psychological level of historical consciousness as mythologization. The danger of uncontrolled mythologization of historical consciousness is that society, under the influence of overly emphasized by the myth of emotional and evaluative components (including a variety of phobias and stereotypes), can succumb either to the temptations of the present archaization or modernization of the past. The thesis that it is the theoretical, scientific level of historical consciousness that plays a leading role in the formation of national consciousness is sufficiently justified, since the formation of the nation is associated with the modernization processes, with the formation of the foundations of industrial society as a stage of development of the world historical process, unthinkable without the leading, "cultural" role of science in the spiritual sphere of society in relation to ordinary social consciousness. It seems reasonable that the ways to solve the urgent problem of formation of the historical consciousness that meets the modern requirements of national security culture, alien to both cultural refinement (the formation of which is associated with the downplaying of the role of the ordinary level of historical consciousness), and falsification on the basis of destructive mythologization (associated with the minimization of the role of its theoretical level), are to promote historical science, philosophical and historical knowledge by means of living, everyday language, as well as in the institutionalization of this process.

1. Bankerova E.I. Istoricheskoe soznanie v sisteme obshchestvennykh otnoshenii [Historical consciousness in the system of public relations]. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Irkutsk state technical university] 2013. no.1 (72). pp. 199-207 (in Russian).

2. Barg M.A. Istoricheskoe soznanie kak problema istoriografii [Historical consciousness as historiography problem] Voprosy istorii [History questions] 1982. No.12. pp. 49-67 (in Russian).

3. Barg M.A. Kategorii i metody istoricheskoi nauki [Categories and methods of historical science] Nauka [Science]. Moscow,1984. 341 p.

4. Gobozov I.A. Vvedenie v filosofiiu istorii [Introduction to history philosophy]. Moscow: Gumanitarnoe znanie [Humanitarian knowledge], 1993. 306 p. (in Russian).

5. Linchenko A.A. Problema istoricheskogo soznaniia v filosofii i teorii istorii Iorna Riuzena [The problem of historical consciousness in philosophy and Y. Ryuzen`s history theory] Izvestiia Saratovskogo universiteta [Proceedings of Saratov university]. Seriia Filosofiia. Politologiia. Pedagogika [Philosophy edition. Political science. Pedagogics]. 2015. Vol. 15. I. 4. pp. 22-27 (in Russian).

6. Mogilnitsky B.G. Istoricheskoe poznanie i istoricheskoe soznanie. Istoricheskaia nauka i istoricheskoe soznanie [Historical knowledge and historical consciousness. Historical science and historical consciousness]. Under the editorship of B.G. Mogilnitsky. Tomsk, 2009. 230 p. (in Russian).

7. Putilova E.G. Istoricheskoe soznanie i istoricheskaia pamiat': sootnoshenie poniatii na sovremennom etape [Historical consciousness and historical memory: correlation of concepts at the present stage] Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i iuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiia i iskusstvovedenie [Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural science and art criticism]. 2012. No. 10-12. 143-145 p. (in Russian).

8. Repina L.P. Opyt sotsial'nykh krizisov v istoricheskoi pamiati. Krizisy perelomnykh epokh v istoricheskoi pamiati [Experience of social crises in historical memory. Crises of critical epochs in historical memory]. 2012. pp. 3-37 (in Russian).

9. Rudenko A.M. Sotsiovital'naia kontseptsiia smyslozhiznennoi intentsional'nosti ekzistentsii cheloveka [Social and vital concept of life-purpose intentionality of man existence]. Dissertation of Dr. phil. Rostov-on-Don. 2012. 374 p. (in Russian).

10. Svirida N.N. Istoricheskoe soznanie kak iavlenie kul'tury [Historical consciousness as culture phenomenon] avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata filosofskikh nauk [Candidate`s Diss.]. Omsk, 2004. 18 p. (in Russian).

11. Syrov V.N. V kakom istoricheskom soznanii my nuzhdaemsia: k metodologii podkhoda i praktike ispol'zovaniia [What historical consciousness we need: to methodology of approach and practice of use]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Tomsk state university]. Istoriia [History]. 2013. No. 1 (21). pp. 183-190 (in Russian).

12. Terekhova V.A. Mif kak paradigma obshchestvennogo soznaniia [Myth as paradigm of public consciousness]. XXI vek: budushchee Rossii v filosofskom izmerenii: Materialy Vtorogo rossiiskogo filosofskogo kongressa [The 21st century: Russian future in philosophical dimension: proceedings of the Second Russian philosophical congress] on June 7-11, 1999 / in 2 V. Yekaterinburg. 1999. Vol. 2. 242 p. (in Russian).

13. Fedorovsky A.P. Istoricheskoe soznanie: osobennosti formirovaniia i ob"ektivatsii [Historical consciousness: features of formation and objectivization]. Vestnik Adygeiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Adygei state university]. Seriia1. Regionovedenie: filosofiia, istoriia, sotsiologiia, iurisprudentsiia, politologiia, kul'turologiia [Edition 1. Regional studies: philosophy, history, social science, legal science, political science, cultural science]. 2011. No. 3. pp. 29-34 (in Russian).

14. Chistyakov M.N. Istoricheskoe soznanie kak spetsificheskii tip ontologii: k probleme vydeleniia invariantov sotsial'nosti [Historical consciousness as specific type of ontology: to the problem of allocation of sociality invariants]. Vestnik NGU Seriia: Filosofiia [Bulletin of NSU. Edition: Philosophy]. 2010. Vol. 8. I. 1. pp. 15-21 (in Russian).

15. Shestakov Yu.A. Istoricheskoe soznanie kak faktor strategicheskogo protivodeistviia ugrozam natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossii [Historical consciousness as a factor of strategic counteraction to threats of national security of Russia]. Gumanitarnye i sotsial'nye nauki [Humanitarian and social sciences]. 2016. No. 5. pp. 58-69 (in Russian).

16. Finko M.V. Problema mezhlichnostnogo obshcheniia i dukhovnyi krizis: kul'turologicheskii analiz [The problem of interpersonal communication and spiritual crisis: culturological analysis]. Izvestiia vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Severo-Kavkazskii region] Proceedings of higher educational institutions. The North Caucasus region. Seriia: Obshchestvennye nauki [Edition: Social sciences]. 2005. No. 3. pp. 9-14 (in Russian).

17. Shestakov Yu.A., Nesmeyanov E.E. L.P. Karsavin’s historiosophy in the light of basic problems of Russian national security protection. Science almanac of Black Sea region countries. 2015. No. 4 (4). pp. 16-20.

18. Uznarodov D.I. The specifics of the internal migration processes in the North Caucasus in the post-soviet period. Science almanac of Black Sea region countries. 2016. No. 2. Available at: http://science-almanac.ru