Preview

Science Almanac of Black Sea Region Countries

Advanced search

Differences and Similarities in The Non-Verbal Language of The Peoples of The Black Sea Region and The Balkan Peninsula

https://doi.org/10.23947/2414-1143-2021-25-1-30-36

Abstract

The last decades have witnessed a growing interest in the contribution of pragmatism and non-verbal semiotics to the study of communication. Pragmatics rooted in philosophy, anthropology, sociology, explores language in social contexts, the ways in which people create and understand meanings through language. This branch of linguistics was developed in the 70s last century. The term pragmatics was invented in the 1930s by philosopher and psychologist C. Morris. According to his theory, signs do not refer to physical signs, but to the tone of voice and body language, i.e. movements, gestures, postures which often accompany speech. The application of semiotic concepts and methods in the field of cultural research today is the production and interpretation of meanings that are created through the deployment of the actions of objects that function as signs. The system of signs is made up of semantic relations that may exist between these signs. Such a relationship unfolds in space and time. The main attention in this work is paid to the consideration of the ways and means of expressing consent and disagreement in the language of the peoples of the countries of the Black Sea basin and the Balkan. A comparative typological study of the symbolic meaning of this expression in the non-verbal language of the people of Bulgaria and neighboring countries under the rule of the Ottoman Empire has been carried out.

About the Authors

N. N. Abueva
Dagestan State Technical University
Russian Federation

Nazhavat N. Abueva, Ph.D. in Philology, Professor 



A. Sh. Archilaeva
Dagestan State Technical University
Russian Federation

Atikat Sh. Archilaeva, Assistant Professor 



Y. U. Khochavova
Dagestan State Technical UniversityDagestan State University of National Economy
Russian Federation

Yulduz U. Khochavova, Ph.D. in Philology, Associate Professor 



References

1. Petrova Yu.A. Yazyk kak model tsennostnogo prostranstva kultury, Monografiya. Izdatelstvo: No.129/3465, Rostovskiy gosudarstvennyy ekonomicheskiy universitet (RINKH) [Language as a model of the value space of culture, Monograph. Publisher: No. 129/3465, Rostov State University of Economics (RINH)]. 2019. 98 p. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yulia_Petrova (accessed 15 January 2021) (In Russian).

2. Petrova Yu.A., Shevkun Yu.S. Mify i legendy Chernomorskogo regiona [Myths and legends of the Black Sea region]. Nauchnyy almanakh stran Prichernomorya. 2019. No. 1 (17). pp. 15-19.

3. Whorf B.L. Nauka i yazykoznaniye [Science and linguistics]. Novoye v lingvistike. Moscow: Inostrannaya literatura, 1960. V. 1. pp.169-182. (In Russian).

4. Darwin Ch. Expression of Emotion in Man and Animals D. Appleton & Company, pp. 275-276, 1913, 372 p.

5. Glénard A. Russko-turetskaya voyna 1877 goda: istoriko-diplomaticheskíy etyud [Russian-Turkish War of 1877: Historical and Diplomatic Study]. Tip. V.͡IA. Barbeĭ. 1878. 407 p. (In Russian).

6. Morris Сh. Signs, Language and Behavior. Paperback, Literary Licensing, LLC. 2011. 380 р.

7. Peirce Ch.S. Collected Papers of C. S. Peirce, V. I and II: Principles of Philosophy and Elements of Logic, ed. by C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, Belknap Press. 1932. 962 р.

8. Petrova Y.A. Ethnography of communication. The humanities and social-economic sciences. 2016. No. 2 (87). pp. 88-90.

9. Petrova Yu., Bukreyeva V. Culture of the peoples of the Balkan peninsula: history and modern influence of Turkey. Science Almanac of Black Sea Region Countries. 2020. No. 3 (23). pp. 45-52.

10. Petrova Yu., Kuleshova K. Cultural and historical evolution of the Turkish language under the influence and borrowing of European languages. Science Almanac of Black Sea Region Countries. 2020. No. 1 (21). pp. 65-70.

11. Petrova Yu.A., Alehina M.V., Romanchenko A.P., Shkrobot V.Y. Hikikomori as psychological type of person by the example of Japan. Problems of development of a personality: diversity of approaches. Materials of the IV international scientific conference, Vedecko vydavatelske centrum Sociosfera-CZ s.r.o. (Prague), 2017. pp. 67-70.

12. Susskind J.M., Lee D.H., Cusi А., Feiman R., Grabski W. & Anderson A.K. Expressing fear enhances sensory acquisition. Nature Neuroscience. 2008. рр.843-850.

13. Thayer H.S., Rosenthal S.B. Pragmatism. Encyclopædia Britannica. 2020. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/pragmatism-philosophy (accessed 15 January 2021).

14. The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. Semiotics. Encyclopædia Britannica, May 21, 2020. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/science/semiotics (accessed 15 January 2021).

15. Torop P. Semiotics of cultural history. Sign Systems Studies. 45. 317. 10.12697/SSS. 2017. 45.3-4.07.

16. World Population Review. 2020 World population by country. Available at: https://worldpopulationreview.com. (accessed 15 January 2021).


Review

For citations:


Abueva N.N., Archilaeva A.Sh., Khochavova Y.U. Differences and Similarities in The Non-Verbal Language of The Peoples of The Black Sea Region and The Balkan Peninsula. Science Almanac of Black Sea Region Countries. 2021;25(1):30-36. https://doi.org/10.23947/2414-1143-2021-25-1-30-36

Views: 138


ISSN 2414-1143 (Online)
12+