Clip thinking: specificity, socio-cultural consequences, ways of overcoming
https://doi.org/10.23947/2414-1143-2022-32-4-10-14
Abstract
The article substantiates the increased threat of the loss of traditional spiritual and moral guidelines, the introduction of ideals and values isolated from historical traditions into the minds of Russian people. The theory justifying such a type of person as a posthuman is critically evaluated. The prerequisites for the appearance of a posthuman, one of the signs of which is clip thinking, are considered. The closeness of clip and mythological thinking is emphasized. It is noted that clip thinking creates prerequisites for the appearance of fakes. Methodological approaches of countering fake information, applicable in pedagogical practice, are proposed.
About the Authors
E. E. Nesmeyanov
Don State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Evgeny E. Nesmeyano, Ph.D. (Advanced Doctorate) in Philosophy, Professor
G. S. Kharlamova
Don State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Galina S. Kharlamova, Ph.D. (Advanced Doctorate) in Philosophy, Associate professor, Professor
References
1. Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 02.07.2021 N 400 "O Strategii natsionalnoi bezopasnosti1. Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 02.07.2021 N 400 "On the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation"]. Available at: www.consultant.ru (accessed 10 May 2022).
2. Shevandrin N.I. Sotsialnaia psikhologiia v obrazovanii: Uchebnoe posobie. Ch. 1: Kontseptualnye osnovy sotsialnoi psikhologii [Social psychology in education: Textbook. Part 1: Conceptual foundations of social psychology]. Moscow: VLADOS. 1995. 544 p. (in Russian).
3. Korablina E.P. Fenomenologicheskie metody v psikhologo-pedagogicheskoi praktike. [Phenomenological methods in psychological and pedagogical practice]. News of the Russian State Pedagogical University named after A.I. Herzen: psychological and pedagogical sciences (psychology, pedagogy, theory and teaching methodology): Saint Petersburg. 2010 (in Russian).
4. Shalagina S.N. Germenevtika. Aspekty issledovaniia. Molodoi uchenyi [Hermeneutics. Aspects of research. Young scientist]. 2016. No. 29 (133) (in Russian).
5. Gershunsky B.S. Filosofiia obrazovaniia dlia XXI veka [Philosophy of education for the 21st century]. Moscow: Sovershenstvo. 1998 (in Russian).
6. Frolova N.G. Sotsialno-filosofskie aspekty germenevtiki v sovremennom obrazovanii [Socio-philosophical aspects of hermeneutics in modern education]. Thesis of Ph.D. in Philosophy: 09.00.11. Krasnoyarsk. 2001 (in Russian).
7. Girenok F.I. Klipovoe soznanie [Clip consciousness]. Moscow: Prospect. 2016 (in Russian).
8. Pudalov A.D. Klipovoe myshlenie – sovremennyi podkhod k poznaniiu. [Clip thinking is a modern approach to cognition]. Modern technologies and scientific and technological progress. 2011. V. 1. No. 1 (in Russian).
9. Gritsenko I.A. Klipovoe myshlenie – novyi etap razvitiia chelovechestva [Clip thinking is a new stage in the development of mankind]. Scientific notes of the Russian State Social University. 2012. No. 4 (104) (in Russian).
10. Zhuravlev S.I. Klipovoe myshlenie kak sposob videniia realnosti [Clip thinking as a way of seeing reality]. Graduate Bulletin of the Volga Region. 2014. No. 7-8 (in Russian).
11. Koshel V.A., Segal A.P. "Klipovoe myshlenie” kak forma obydennogo soznaniia ["Clip thinking" as a form of ordinary consciousness]. International Academic Bulletin. 2015. No. 4 (10) (in Russian).
12. Staritsyna O.A. Klipovoe myshlenie VS obrazovanie. Kto vinovat i chto delat? [Clip thinking VS education. Who is to blame and what to do?]. Azimuth of scientific research: pedagogy and psychology. 2018. V. 7. No. 2(23) (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Nesmeyanov E.E., Kharlamova G.S. Clip thinking: specificity, socio-cultural consequences, ways of overcoming. Science Almanac of Black Sea Region Countries. 2022;32(4):10-14. https://doi.org/10.23947/2414-1143-2022-32-4-10-14
Views:
1212
Email this article 