<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">scialm</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Научный альманах стран Причерноморья</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Science Almanac of Black Sea Region Countries</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2414-1143</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Донской государственный технический университет</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23947/2414-1143-2021-27-3-51-57</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">scialm-128</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Современные методологии исследования социокультурных феноменов (теория и история культуры)</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Modern methodologies for the study of sociocultural phenomena (theory and history of culture)</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Логическая культура Древней Руси</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Logical Culture of Ancient Rus</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Агапов</surname><given-names>Е. П.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Agapov</surname><given-names>E. P.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Агапов Евгений Петрович, доктор философских наук, профессор </p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Evgeny P. Agapov, Ph.D. (Advanced Doctorate) in Philosophy, Professor, </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">march10@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Пендюрина</surname><given-names>Л П.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Pendyurina</surname><given-names>L. P.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Пендюрина Людмила Петровна, доктор философских наук, доцент </p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Lyudmila P. Pendyurina, Ph.D. (Advanced Doctorate) in Philosophy, Associate Professor </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">prinpet@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Ростовский государственный экономический университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Rostov State University of Economics</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Донской государственный технический университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Don State Technical University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>04</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>51</fpage><lpage>57</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Агапов Е.П., Пендюрина Л.П., 2021</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Агапов Е.П., Пендюрина Л.П.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Agapov E.P., Pendyurina L.P.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.science-almanac.ru/jour/article/view/128">https://www.science-almanac.ru/jour/article/view/128</self-uri><abstract><p>Статья посвящена становлению логики в России, которое началось в 18 в. Однако её предпосылки уходят в значительно более глубокие пласты отечественной культуры. Логическая культура любого общества представляет собой характерную для него совокупность стереотипов мышления, которая проявляется в способах аргументации, а также в умении оценивать умозаключения, разрабатывать гипотезы, систематизировать объекты и т. д. Первым логико-философским трактатом в Древней Руси считается «Изборник Святослава», логическая часть которого содержала изложение аристотелевского трактата «Категории», а также комментария к нему, написанного в 3 в. сирийским логиком Порфирием. Более обширный логический материал можно было почерпнуть из переводов и переложений «Диалектики», написанной в 8 в. византийским богословом Иоанном Дамаскином. В ней рассматривались аристотелевские категории, а также суждение и категорический силлогизм. Возникновение логики в России было связано не только с её внутренними закономерностями, но и с потребностями развития тех областей теоретической и практической деятельности, в которых важная роль отводилась обоснованности и убедительности рассуждений. Из областей теоретической деятельности важнейшими были математика и философия, а из областей практической деятельности – общинно-вечевое правление. Развитие логической культуры, начавшееся в Древней Руси в 11 в., привело в 18 в. к становлению логики в России. Но ещё потребовалось несколько десятилетий, чтобы логика в России превратилась в самостоятельную науку.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article is devoted to the formation of logic in Russia, which began in the 18th century. However, its prerequisites go into much deeper layers of Russian culture. The logical culture of any society is a characteristic set of stereotypes of thinking, which is manifested in the methods of argumentation, as well as in the ability to evaluate inferences, develop hypotheses, systematize objects, etc. The first logical and philosophical treatise in Ancient Rus is considered to be the "Anthology of Svyatoslav," the logical part of which contained a presentation of the Aristotelian treatise "Categories," as well as a commentary on it, written in the 3rd century by the Syrian logician Porphyry. More extensive logical material could be drawn from the translations and renditions of "Dialectics," written in the 8th century by Byzantine theologian John of Damascus. The Aristotelian categories were considered in them, as well as judgment and categorical syllogism. The emergence of logic in Russia was associated not only with its internal objective laws, but also with needs for the development of those areas of theoretical and practical activity in which the important role was assigned to the validity and persuasiveness of reasoning. Mathematics and philosophy were the most important among the areas of theoretical activity. Governance of community and veche was the most important among the areas of practical activity. The development of logical culture, which began in Ancient Rus in the 11th century, in the 18th century led to the formation of logic in Russia. But it took decades for logic in Russia to become an independent science.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>культура</kwd><kwd>логическая культура</kwd><kwd>древнерусская культура</kwd><kwd>логика как наука</kwd><kwd>предпосылки логики</kwd><kwd>учение об умозаключениях</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>culture</kwd><kwd>logical culture</kwd><kwd>ancient Russian culture</kwd><kwd>logic as a science</kwd><kwd>logic prerequisites</kwd><kwd>doctrine of inference</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Агапов Е.П. Логика. М. 2015. 160 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Agapov E.P. Logika [Logic]. Moscow. 2015. 160 p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Безрукова В.С. Основы духовной культуры (энциклопедический словарь педагога). Екатеринбург. 2000. 937 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bezrukova V.S. Osnovy dukhovnoi kultury (entsiklopedicheskii slovar pedagoga) [Fundamentals of Spiritual Culture (teacher's encyclopedic dictionary)]. Yekaterinburg. 2000. 937 p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Естественнонаучные представления Древней Руси: сборник статей. М. 1978. 176 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Estestvennonauchnye predstavleniia Drevnei Rusi: sbornik statei [Natural science representations of Ancient Rus: Collection of articles]. Moscow. 1978. 176 p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">История русской философии / под ред. М. А. Маслина. М. 2001. 639 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Istoriia russkoi filosofii pod red. M.A. Maslina [History of Russian Philosophy edited by M.A. Maslin]. Moscow. 2001. 639 p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Логика в России // Новая философская энциклопедия. В 4 т. Т. 1 / под ред. В.С. Стёпина. М. 2010. С. 407-414.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Logika v Rossii. Novaia filosofskaia entsiklopediia [Logic in Russia. New philosophical encyclopedia]. In 4 volumes. V. 1 edited by V.S. Stepin. Moscow. 2010. pp. 407-414 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мазурин А.Н. Демократическое управление в Новгородской республике // Фундаментальные и прикладные исследования: проблемы и результаты. 2015. № 21. С. 25-29.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mazurin A.N. Demokraticheskoe upravlenie v Novgorodskoi respublike. Fundamentalnye i prikladnye issledovaniia: problemy i rezultaty [Democratic governance in the Novgorod Republic. Fundamental and applied research: problems and results]. 2015. No. 21. pp. 25-29 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маковельский А.О. История логики. М. 2004. 480 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Makovelsky A.O. Istoriia logiki [History of logic]. Moscow. 2004. 480 p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мильков В.В. Переводные философские сочинения в русской книжности конца XV – середины XVI веков: еврейские и арабские влияния // Историко-философский ежегодник. 2016. С. 269-295.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Milkov V.V. Perevodnye filosofskie sochineniia v russkoi knizhnosti kontsa XV – serediny XVI vekov: evreiskie i arabskie vliianiia. Istoriko-filosofskii ezhegodnik [Translated philosophical works in the Russian bookishness of the late 15th- mid- 16th centuries: Jewish and Arab influences. Historical and Philosophical Yearbook]. 2016. pp. 269-295 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Свинцов В.И. Логическая культура личности и общества // Общественные науки и современность. 1993. № 4. С. 114-124.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Svintsov V.I. Logicheskaia kultura lichnosti i obshchestva. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost [The logical culture of the individual and society. Social sciences and modernity]. 1993. No. 4. pp. 114-124 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сорина Г.В., Меськов В.С. Вперёд к логике: использован ли в полной мере потенциал логики при анализе и моделировании рассуждений? // РАЦИО.ru. 2009. № 2. С. 152-196.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sorina G.V., Meskov V.S. Vpered k logike: ispolzovan li v polnoi mere potentsial logiki pri analize i modelirovanii rassuzhdenii? [Forward to logic: has the full potential of logic been used in the analysis and modeling of reasoning?] RACIO.ru. 2009. No. 2. pp. 152-196.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шапчиц П.А. Очерк истории логики и логической терминологии Древней Руси // Актуальные проблемы русской философии и культуры. СПб. 2007. С. 130-142.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shapchits P.A. Ocherk istorii logiki i logicheskoi terminologii Drevnei Rusi. Aktualnye problemy russkoi filosofii i kultury [Essay on the history of logic and logical terminology of Ancient Rus. Actual problems of Russian philosophy and culture]. Saint Petersburg. 2007. pp. 130-142 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Эйлер Л. Письма к немецкой принцессе о разных физических и философских материях. СПб. 2002. 719 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Euler L. Pisma k nemetskoi printsesse o raznykh fizicheskikh i filosofskikh materiiakh [Letters to the German princess about different physical and philosophical substances]. Saint Petersburg. 2002. 719 p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кондаков Н.И. Логический словарь-справочник. 2-е, испр. и доп. изд. М. 1975. 717 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kondakov N.I. Logicheskii slovar-spravochnik [Logical dictionary]. The 2nd revised and enlarged edition. Moscow. 1975. 717 p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гаврюшин Н.К. Митрополит Даниил – редактор «Диалектики» // Труды Отдела древнерусской литературы. Т. XLI. Л. 1988. С. 357-363.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gavryushin N.K. Mitropolit Daniil – redaktor "Dialektiki". Trudy Otdela drevnerusskoi literatury [Metropolitan Daniel – editor of "Dialectics". Proceedings of the Department of the Old Russian Literature]. V. XLI. L. 1988. pp. 357-363. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Стяжкин Н.И. Формирование математической логики. М. 1967. 504 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Styazhkin N.I. Formirovanie matematicheskoi logiki [Formation of mathematical logic]. Moscow. 1967. 504 p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гнеденко Б.В. Очерки по истории математики в России. М.-Л. 1946. 247 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gnedenko B.V. Ocherki po istorii matematiki v Rossii [Essays on the history of mathematics in Russia]. Moscow-Leningrad. 1946. 247 p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
